by 
The Enforcement Directorate has removed the Nirav Modi diamond jewellery properties worth Rs.1000 crore for sale at auction.
In the main development, the Enforcement Directorate has removed the buildings of the Nirav Modi runaway diamonds worth Rs.1000 crore. He is accused of being a key figure in the fraudulent issuance of Letters of Undertaking as part of a plot to defraud Punjab National Bank at a rate of Rs 13,570 crore.
Since his arrest on March 19, 2019, the PNB suspect has been languishing in Wandsworth Prison after being denied bail several times. Released properties will be auctioned off soon to recover PNB pending payments.
These include the famous Rhythm House in Kala Ghoda, an apartment on Napean Sea Road and an Kurla office building without jewellery. According to sources, the National Company Law Tribunal has appointed the seller to sell the properties.
Responding to a discussion on the second batch of Additional Grants for Lok Sabha on Monday, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman cited ED data to reveal that Rs.13,109.17 crore has been recovered from the sale of refugee property to Vijay Mallya, Nirav 21 Modi and July 20 .
Legal proceedings in Nirav Modi's case
By approving the return of Nirav Modi to India, District Judge Samuel Goozee of the Westminster Magistrate's Court ruled on February 25 to open a first case of money laundering. Noting that the Letters of Understanding was issued between 2011 and 2017 without being included in the bank's CBS system to mislead the authorities, he did not accept that the defendant was involved in legal business.
Expressing satisfaction that Nirav Modi may be convicted, the judge also dismissed some of the arguments presented by the defense counsel.
It dispels concerns about Nirav Modi's mental health, disputing allegations that India's prisons are overcrowded. By keeping Barrack 12 at Arthur Road Prison more open than the current prison, the judge made it clear that the Indian government does not need to provide additional details of the health care that the defendant will provide.
However, Judge Martin Chamberlain of the UK Supreme Court allowed him to file an appeal against his extradition to India citing Disputes 3 and 4 outside Section 91 of the UK Criminal Justice Act.
